|
It all sounds too incredible to be true, but we better believe it and get organizing to save our pensions and benefits.
UC has clearly stated that health benefits are not an entitlement. UC can unilaterally change the monthly premiums, curtail or completely eliminate coverage. Over the past several years, current retirees have seen their monthly premiums increase dramatically.
UC has projected that it may increase the employee contribution from the current average of 12% of the cost of benefits to more than 30%. For the average health plan, this means your co-pay would be approximately $250 per month.
UC’s unions all supported the health care reform proposition on last fall’s 2004 ballot, but UC did not. The proposition would have provided health coverage for millions of uninsured Californians. Our benefits costs are currently inflated to account for the care received by these massive numbers of uninsured. Even though UC medical centers end up caring for a disproportionately high percentage of the indigent and uninsured, UC did not support this modest reform to our health care system.
UC’s retirement program has been quite healthy for decades, and employees have not been required to make contributions to the defined benefit plan for 15 years. UC is now discussing mandatory employee contributions of up to 8% of our salary. The union has the right to negotiate over such cuts.
UC may take away the 2% contributions you currently make to a 401K style defined contribution plan (which adds to your basic retirement), and force you instead to pay it to the UCRP defined benefit plan at no extra benefit to you.
New employees may be excluded from defined benefit plan.
Those employees would only be eligible for a 401K-style defined contribution plan. Under such a plan you have no guaranteed retirement check, but have to pay Wall Street money managers to roll the dice with your retirement savings. If no new employees are admitted to the defined benefit plan we currently have, that plan will lose its future funding base, putting our pensions at risk. Setting up a defined contribution plan for new employees could cost a huge amount, and that may also undermine the stability of our current defined benefit plan.
UC may set up special retirement benefits for executives and faculty. UC argues that this will be necessary to attract the most qualified and talented leadership. But after years of dedication, why should those of us who keep this university running end up with an inferior retirement plan?
In 2000, the UC Regents forced the resignation of long time UC treasurer Patricia Small, who had rung up healthy gains for our fund, with an annual average return of 16% over two decades. UC Regent Gerald Parsky, who chaired Bush’s California reelection campaign, convinced the Regents to give over management our retirement fund to a private firm, Wilshire Associates, run by Dennis Tito, himself a major Bush donor. Tito invested large sums of money in Enron, promptly losing hundreds of millions of dollars of our retirement fund. UC has been suing to get some of this money back. Now our retirement fund has substantially declined in value, and UC is proposing that we make contributions up to 15 years earlier than would have been necessary before Wilshire Associates got our money to play with. Why should we pay for their mistakes?
Read all the bad news in UC’s own words. The UC web pages, letters, and management presentations from which these alarming projections are extracted are all available on the UPTE website.
Talk to your coworkers about this extremely serious situation. Contact your UPTE local to find out how you can help fight these take backs. And post this flyer in your workplace to help spread the word about the threat to our benefits. |